|
Post by gugesmk3 on Jul 17, 2016 13:03:37 GMT
How many think that license holders of say Colt or H&K will honor the brand by making items that consumers want versus say making the rband and having a consumer buy it because they recognize the name but really don't know or care that the product is a lower grade. They just think that if the brand exists. It must be good. And with that, please take this old poll, if you have not. www.surveymonkey.com/r/ZR2T2ZR
|
|
dls
New Member
Posts: 5
|
Post by dls on Sept 20, 2016 8:01:38 GMT
Honestly the problem with that survey is that i dont care who makes it, if its something physically i want for a design ill take it... but what changes is that i know how to tech and will swap in the good stuff for the bad. IF you're solely looking at that im not allowed to tech it, then my answers would change.
-dLs-
|
|
|
Post by gugesmk3 on Oct 1, 2016 22:40:43 GMT
The scope is brand...not universal upgradeability. Of which that doesn't exist across makers. There are variances...and how bad the variance determines upgrade paths.
|
|
dls
New Member
Posts: 5
|
Post by dls on Oct 5, 2016 11:11:26 GMT
It's basic marketing strategy... buy a known name, slap it on Faerie Fluff that is low cost, high return and sell sell sell. That is a typical tactic and starting to tick people off towards traded things. They dont see quality they seen quantity of $$... which fucks Faerie Fluff up -.-... I wish they'd make a good product with a good name. point in case We Tech G Series Pistol/Stark Arms G Series Pistol. Was good, useful, and honestly robust... then it kinda... got dicked by greed and guess what we no longer have G Series Pistols. tiz a sad day.
-dLs-
|
|